Download one normalized daily edition of public award-stage notices from TED, Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. Analyze buyers, named suppliers, lifecycle stages, values and classifications—with every row linked back to its official source.
Refresh
Daily publication window
Formats
CSV · JSON · JSONL
Lifecycle
Intended · Contracted · Awarded
Privacy
Contact fields excluded
Latest daily edition
All three files contain the same normalized rows. The manifest documents the row grain, aggregation warning, source coverage, run outcome, byte size and checksum.
Official sources
Source systems publish different stages and structures. Every record keeps its original URL and licensing reference; the live status below comes from the latest manifest.
European Union and other TED-participating jurisdictions
Completed3,143
source items processed
Result notices from Tenders Electronic Daily that name a selected winner. The current edition uses a conservative notice-to-winner row when award relationships cannot be aligned safely.
Window: result notices published on target_date; latest notice versions only
United Kingdom (Find a Tender coverage)
Completed168
source items processed
Award-stage OCDS releases from the UK's central procurement platform. UK6 notices are marked intended; UK7 or a signed-date relationship is marked contracted.
Window: award releases updated in the target_date and previous-day overlap
United Kingdom (Contracts Finder coverage)
Completed284
source items processed
OCDS award releases from Contracts Finder, including awards connected to procurements begun under the earlier UK regime.
Window: award releases published in the target_date and previous-day overlap
A Find a Tender UK6 notice follows the award decision but precedes contract signature; UK7 confirms that the contract was entered into. The normalized award_stage preserves that distinction. Read the official award-notice guidance ↗.
TED's result notices can contain several winners, awards and values. Until those XML relationships are aligned safely, this dataset emits a conservative notice-winner row, uses the notice identifier as its stable result namespace and leaves uncertain dates, values, currencies and supplier details blank rather than guessing. See the official competition-results model ↗.
UK source attribution: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Normalized schema
One award × supplier where the source exposes that relationship; TED is conservatively one result notice × named winner. Dates use ISO 8601 strings, monetary values stay paired with their currency, and classification codes retain their source scheme.
idsourcesource_award_idsource_supplier_idsource_notice_idsource_release_idnotice_typetitleaward_statusaward_stageaward_datecontract_signed_atpublished_atcontract_start_atcontract_end_atbuyer_namebuyer_countrybuyer_regionsupplier_countsupplier_namesupplier_identifiersupplier_countryaward_valueaward_currencyprocurement_methodcategoryclassification_schemeclassification_codesplace_countryplace_regionsource_urlsource_licensefirst_seen_atlast_seen_atcontent_hashchange_typeHow it is prepared
The pipeline keeps source semantics visible and leaves uncertain relationships blank instead of manufacturing a cleaner-looking record.
Request each official publication or update window and retain the source identifiers needed for traceability.
Keep explicit award or result releases and named suppliers; exclude source records without a usable award outcome.
Map lifecycle, buyer, supplier, value, classification and place fields without collapsing intended and contracted stages.
Write CSV, JSON and JSONL atomically, then publish source status, row-grain notes and SHA-256 checksums in the manifest.
What you can do with it
01
Group named suppliers by buyer, category, place or classification to explore a public-sector supplier landscape.
02
Follow contracting authorities over time and compare the categories, procedures and suppliers they report.
03
Use stable row IDs, publication dates, change types and source links as inputs to a focused award-monitoring workflow.
04
Test supplier enrichment, procurement search or market-analysis ideas before commissioning broader history or coverage.
Coverage & responsible use
01
A daily edition captures notices published or updated in the source window. award_date or contract_signed_at can be earlier than the edition date.
02
Use award_stage before treating a row as a signed contract. In particular, UK6 is intended and UK7 is contracted.
03
award_value is an award-level value repeated on every supplier row. Do not sum it across supplier rows; deduplicate using source, source_notice_id, and source_award_id. supplier_count reports the number of source suppliers for that award or TED notice.
04
TED rows name a selected winner and use the notice ID as a stable result namespace. Award dates, values, currencies and public supplier identifiers stay blank until the source XML relationships can be parsed safely.
05
The first edition uses TED, Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. It is not a comprehensive ledger of all European, worldwide or United States government contract awards.
06
award_value preserves the value reported by the notice, whose meaning can vary by source and notice stage. It should not be treated as invoiced or paid government spending.
07
Official publication duties vary by procurement regime, threshold and exemption. Notices can also be delayed, corrected, replaced or cancelled, so revisit source_url for decisions that matter.
08
The public schema does not map contact-person names, email addresses, telephone numbers, or street addresses. Supplier organization names and public organization identifiers are retained as the subject of each award. Publisher-supplied title and organization-name text can still contain unexpected details and should be reviewed for privacy-sensitive uses.
FAQ
Practical details about lifecycle stages, row grain, aggregation, verification and reuse of the daily award edition.
Yes. The latest daily CSV, JSON and JSONL files can be downloaded without an account, email address or payment details.
The initial dataset uses result or award-stage releases from TED, Find a Tender and Contracts Finder. It covers those European and UK source systems; it does not claim comprehensive worldwide or United States contract-award coverage.
No. Some official notices report an intended award before contract signature. Use award_stage: intended means a reported award decision, contracted means the source reports a signed or entered contract, awarded means an explicit award without enough evidence to classify it as contracted, and unknown means the source was inconclusive.
Where the source exposes an award-to-supplier relationship, one row represents one award and one named supplier. TED is currently more conservative: one row represents one result notice and one named winner when flattened source fields cannot be safely aligned to a specific award.
Not directly. A multi-supplier award can repeat its award-level value on each supplier row. Deduplicate with source, source_notice_id and source_award_id before summing award values, and review supplier_count. TED award values may be blank when the source relationship cannot be aligned safely.
The pipeline runs daily. The edition records notices published or updated in each source window; the award decision or contract signature itself may have happened earlier. The manifest reports the exact edition date, source status, coverage notes and checksums.
Each source retains its own reuse terms. Records include the source URL and source-license URL, and the manifest lists source licenses. Review those terms for your use case; WebTruffle does not place one blanket license over the combined source data.
Open source_url and rely on the official notice for the authoritative lifecycle stage, supplier, value, amendments and contract details. The normalized file is for discovery and analysis, not a substitute for the source record.
Yes. WebTruffle can scope historical archives, additional award systems, company enrichment, custom filters and managed API or file delivery around a defined procurement market.
Need more than the free edition?
Add jurisdictions, history, company enrichment, custom qualification rules, alerts or an API. WebTruffle can manage the collection and delivery while your team works with the data.